Sincerity of faith is not an inoculation against participating in evil.

Yeah I’m sure this is exactly how things played out…

[Disclaimer: This post explores injustices and this post contains graphic and explicit pictures of violence and dead bodies related to that subject.]

No one can really deny that Christians have supported and participated in very serious evils in history. At least some of these evils are now commonly condemned and seen as plainly non-Christian and against the teachings of Jesus. However, at the time, Christians went along with them, seeing nothing wrong.

Anytime I have brought this fact up, Christians are quick to justify, explain away, deny or minimize the damage done by Christians. In the past, I have done so myself.

These deflections are fairly shallow attempts to evade responsibility for the past behavior of Christians. Perhaps more importantly, this defense of past Christians helps avoid what owning these mistakes would call for: present introspection into the Christian community, that might reveal similar injustices in contemporary Christianity.

One of the primary tools I have seen used over and over again when confronted with the reality of evil actions taken by Christians is to call into question the faith of those Christians most directly responsible. It is suggested that, “They were not ‘real’ Christians. ‘Real’ Christians (like me/my church/my tradition) would never do that!”

Not only is this a logical fallacy but it is completely wrong.

While spinning history this way may allow Christians to perpetually believe that we are the good guys/girls of history, it is dishonest and deceitful. It, like the picture of Columbus above, is a make believe picture of our past that paints a false picture of a much more complex and much darker reality. I say this because if we read the journals and writings of Christians throughout history, including the ones we know participated in injustices and evils, you will find sincere faith and orthodox theology and practice in many of them.

For example…

This is a more accurate picture of the legacy of Christopher Columbus. This is the mass grave at Wounded Knee.

For example, let us begin by considering Christopher Columbus and colonialism.  Washington Irving wrote of Christopher Columbus, saying:

“He was devoutly pious: religion mingled with the whole course of his thoughts and actions, and shone forth in his most private and unstudied writings. Whenever he made any great discovery, he celebrated it by solemn thanks to God. The voice of prayer and melody of praise rose from his ships when they first beheld the New World, and his first action on landing was to prostrate himself upon the earth and return thanksgivings. Every evening the Salve Regina and other vesper hymns were chanted by his crew, and masses were performed in the beautiful groves bordering the wild shores of this heathen land. All his great enterprises were undertaken in the name of the Holy Trinity, and he partook of the communion previous to embarkation. He was a firm believer in the efficacy of vows and penances and pilgrimages, and resorted to them in times of difficulty and danger. The religion thus deeply seated in his soul diffused a sober dignity and benign composure over his whole demeanor. His language was pure and guarded, and free from all imprecations, oaths and other irreverent expressions.”

Columbus by this and other accounts was sincere in his faith, even to the point of not cussing. He was also completely for the exploitation of the new land and the enslavement of its people.

“After returning to Spain and reporting on the incredible wealth in the islands of the ‘New World,’ the monarchs gave Columbus 17 ships and more than 1,200 men to plunder the Caribbean. His new expedition went from island to island gathering slaves and gold with unprecedented brutality.

 

Opening the continent to slavery Columbus was the first European slave trader in the Americas. He sent more slaves across the Atlantic Ocean than any individual of his time-about 5,000. He and his men captured and enslaved the Arawak people almost as soon as they landed. Some were sent to Spain and others served Columbus on the islands. In 1496, Columbus jubilantly wrote Spain’s King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella about the possibilities for exploitation in the West Indies: ‘In the name of the Holy Trinity, we can send from here all the slaves and brazil wood which could be sold.’

In Hispaniola, Columbus and the Spanish set up a system that made every Indian over the age of 14 responsible for gathering a certain amount of gold each month. They received copper tokens to hang around their necks if they succeeded. If an Indian was caught without a token, the Spanish cut off their hands and let them bleed to death.” (Source: Banderas News – italics and bolds mine)

This devout Christian was completely fine with participating in these evils. To make it worse, Columbus did not participate in these evils despite his sincere faith, Columbus was rapacious in his desire to exploit the New World because of his faith.

Writing home to his monarchs Columbus claimed that the Gold he sent back from the New World, which he was claiming was Tharsis and Ophir, would fund 100,000 foot soldiers and 10,000 cavalry for the retaking of Jerusalem. Columbus envisioned the exploitation of the New World would fund the retaking of Jerusalem from the Muslims, which he saw as a Christian duty. (Source: Columbus and the Quest for Jerusalem, by Carol Delaney)

Columbus was not simply an imperfect and sinful but otherwise sincere Christian; Columbus was a sincere Christian, fully shaped by the faith and cultures of his day, and that is why he committed heinous evils believing himself to be righteous.

Due to the colonization that followed Columbus’ “discovery” of America the Native American population which had been estimated to number anywhere from 90-112 million pre-contact was decimated to around 250,000 individuals at its lowest point.

Entire tribes, languages and cultures no longer exist.

For example…

The burning of one Christian, the Anabaptist Anneken Hendriks, by other Christians, Spanish Catholics.

During the Reformation, a time of idealized by many Protestant sects, Luther, Calvin and many other Reformers were clearly very sincere in their faith as were many of their Roman Catholic counterparts. Much of the current theology in Christianity is derived from these men or has developed in response to their thought.  Many Christian sects have their origin from this time or owe their origin indirectly to its legacy. Some, such as Lutherans or those who declare themselves to be Calvinists or Arminian, even label themselves after leading theologians from the time.

Many of the leaders of the Reformation also participated in and encouraged anti-Semitism. Some continued to approve of Christians serving in wars (even as mercenaries).  Some persecuted and killed other Christians for believing the wrong things about God. Many of these attitudes and beliefs met with widespread acceptance not criticism.

For example…

Some of the greatest Christian leaders of the day participated in and advocated for slavery.

Skipping forward a few hundred years in history, during the Great Awakening in the Americas the Holy Spirit was being poured out and incredible changes were happening in the U.S. Meanwhile slavery was a reality that was supported or passively accepted by sincere and influential Christians. George Whitefield, the famous American evangelist and orator, advocated for slavery. Jonathan Edwards, who I myself admire in many ways for his faith and thought, owned slaves. The Methodist circuit riders, who died at the average age of twenty-eight because their zeal for evangelism drove them to brave the elements of the American frontier, owned on average eight African slaves a piece. This was a systemic evil that was justified by Christian theology that sincere Christians participated in. This was not a small imperfection in otherwise sincere believers and these were not insincere believers.

For example…

Christianity and racism are not mutually exclusive.

This photograph is from the early 1920’s near Portland, Oregon. While obviously I would not judge all Christians by the KKK’s stance, it cannot be denied that the KKK were started as an anti-black and anti-Catholic Protestant organization. Their stress was on 100% “Americanism” which to them meant being Protestant and White.

For example,

(Most likely) killed by Christians.

This is a photo taken in Marion Indiana in 1930 at the lynching of two black men.  Marion Indiana is currently 75% white and home to the largest Christian university in the Midwest. While I cannot know for sure, statistically speaking most of the people in this photograph, including the man smiling in the lower left, were probably Christians. Again, statistically speaking most of the lynchings that took place in the South were perpetrated by people who went to church the next Sunday.

For example,

 

Most of these people would self-identify as Catholic or Protestant.

Moving forward in time again, Rwanda was touted as a model for missionary success and most Rwandans would self-identity as a Catholic or Protestant. However, Belgian Christian colonists exacerbated existing divisions among Rwandans to make Rwanada easier to rule and exploit. The artificial distinction between Hutu and Tutsi created by these Beglian Christians directly led to the massacre in 1994.

Christians also actively participated in the Rwandan genocide.

“Church personnel and institutions were actively involved in the program of resistance to popular pressures for political reform that culminated in the 1994 genocide, and numerous priests, pastors, nuns, brothers, catechists, and Catholic and Protestant lay leaders supported, participated in, or helped to organize the killings.” (Source: Timothy Longman)

To make this statement a little bit more real, here is a quotation from an Adventist Christian and choir member who participated in the Rwandan genocide.

“EMMANUEL: Alice is the last person I cut. I cut off her hand and made a scar on her face. I thought I killed her. And then I stopped killing. Something had begun to bother me. I was a singer in an Adventist church…I saw the faces of all of the people I killed before me. I remembered I had sung in front of them in church. I thought, ‘How come I killed the same people I was singing for?’ It was time to stop. Still, I had already taken their things, and I decided those things would stay in my house.”

While it is admirable that his faith was part of the reason he stopped, his Christian faith was sincere enough to get him to be an active participant in his church but apparently not enough to stop him from participating in genocide.

For example,

Yup, he’s a Christian.

A number of the participants of abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison were Christians. Upon being confronted by Joseph F. Darby, Charles A. Graner responded,

“The Christian in me says it’s wrong, but the corrections officer in me says, ‘I love to make a grown man piss himself.” (Source: The Washington Post)

For example,

Yup, he’s a Christian. (By the way, obviously minus the text, this is a screen grab from his actual sermon.)

Sean Harris, the pastor and spiritual leader of Berean Baptist Church in Fayetteville advocated that parents beat the homosexuality out of their children if their boys are too effeminate or their girls are too butch. (Source: Jezebel) Around the same time Charles L. Worley, the pastor and spiritual leader of Providence Road Baptist Church in Maiden, N.C. advocated for rounding up homosexuals and surrounding them with an electric fence so that they will die off.(Source: Yahoo) Both of these pastors sermons were met with applause and “amen’s” from their congregation.

Etc., etc., etc.

But what does this mean for Christians today and why do I bring this up?:

No one, no matter how sincere or sentimental in their faith, is categorically prevented from participating in or supporting injustice, evil and oppression that are directly opposed to the Way of Jesus Christ.

Sincerity of faith is not an inoculation against participating in evil. Just because we are devout or sincere in our affection towards Jesus and our commitment to pursue righteousness does not guarantee that all of our practices and beliefs, even commonly and widely accepted ones, are in fact righteous and just.

Because of this reality, Christians need to seriously consider that if followers of Jesus got it way wrong in the past, that we might have it way wrong today. In light of all this we need to be less concerned with perpetually justifying ourselves and more concerned with prayerfully, scripturally and carefully examining the current beliefs and practices of Christian culture that we participate in, no matter how time honored or common sense they are to us.  We need to stop protecting and enshrining evils and injustices that are part of the current status quo in Christian culture all the while pretending or truly believing we are defending God or the Christian way of life and faith. We need to do this because history has shown that just saying, feeling or professing to  really love or believe in Jesus is not enough to ensure you are actually following and obeying the Way of Jesus.

Advertisements

About Kevin

I am figuring out life and faith and taking other people along with me on my journey. Sometimes as fellow travelers, sometimes as hostages.
This entry was posted in Christianity, Personal Commentary and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s